
On appeal against conviction: Held, allowing the appeal, that there was no evidence that what the appellant did to his wife was any more disgustful or painful than tattooing, which, if carried out with the consent of an adult, did not act as an offence under section 47 of the Act of 1861 albeit that developed bodily harm was deliberately inflicted; that there was no ravenous intent on the part of the appellant and it was not in the public interest that such consensual activity among preserve and wife in the privacy of the matrimonial collection family should be a matter for criminal investigation or pros! ecution under section 47; and that, accordingly, the conviction would be quashed (post, pp. 50A-B, E-G). Rex v. Donovan [1934] 2 K.B. 498, C C A . and Reg. v. Brown (Anthony) [1994] 1 A.C. 212, H.L.(E.) distinguished. The following cases are referred to in the judgment: Reg. v. Brown (Anthony) [1994] 1 A . C 212; [1993] 2 W.L.R. 556; [1993] 2 All E.R. 75, H.L.(E.) Rex v. Donovan [1934] 2 K.B. 498, C...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.