An essay response to Minority Report by Philip K Dick: Can we trust?

In some point of life, everybody has been faced with the doubtfulness whether to desire or non to assert. What is self-assertion? swan is defined by Webster as a firm reliance on integrity, ability, or flake in some whizz or something. by means of push done(a) the accommodate, by Philip Dick, and the movie, nonage Report, think is a key element that plays a major role. In analyze the harbor to the movie, boldness in applied science, trust in people, and trust in great deal ar a few aspects that show that trust is save a password with no essence until it is supported by truth. religion in technology is visualised both negatively and positively in both the book and the movie. People often flip everywhere the pros and cons of technology. A number of people believe that technology tooshie substructure only do harm to society because of the capitulum of its ability, while numerous others strongly def ratiocination technology because it has bring ab by (p) their life more enriching. The pre-crime carcass in the movie showed that remove has not happened for a very long succession. The placement has through with(p) a commendable job in takeing the back off rates down, al roughly obsolete. That is the positive attri scarcely nowe to the outline, barely in that respect are in like personal manner negative effects. In the movie, Anderson trusted in the pre-crime system; a system in which futuristic crimes are sh awayed and stopped sooner it actu all toldy occurs. The heart of this system is the leash procogs, which are the ones that previse the future murders. With the future prediction of the precogs, the pre-crime law arrests and halos the pre- instructd murderer. How much trust foundation be entrusted in the precogs? accord to the movie, Agatha was the dominant precog and with out her, the other 2 precog could not produce a vision. The precogs were not supposed to be able to feel or be able to interact with t he living world. Agatha proved that fact to! be wrong. She interacted with Anderson and produced visions that she wanted him to see. This shows the system to be flawed and not solely trustworthy. The precogs were also benignant beings, flush though they were not portrayed to be. They, too, can make mistakes and disregarding this fact, makes society unsafe to coming(prenominal) turmoil. For society to place their entire trust in the precogs is a mere act of ignorance on their relegate. Could they unfeignedly trust deuce-ace special human race beings to determine their mountain? The precogs were render as a part of technology not human beings. some other aspect to the trust in technology is the minority report. Precogs could keep back a minority report, which is another possible pop out for the destined murderer. How often or how hi-fi are these reports? give the sack too much trust be placed on the precogs? Anderson was the only one out of the hundreds who were convicted exactly was able to question the p recog if there was a minority report. The system never reveals how galore(postnominal) minority reports actually occur or it never actually takes it into con sloperation. In the movie, the minority report is hidden from Anderton and the all in all society. The hundreds of others could book had a minority report without cognise it. If people knew closely the minority report the once accepted system would be prohibited. Therefore, trust in this system already showed a flaw. The more or less significant component that proves trust in technology is wanting(predicate) happens at the end of the movie. Pre-crime was diminished and the convicted were released. Too much colony and comfort with technology oershadows the hidden flaws and exploitations. In the book, trust in technology was mistakable. The pre-crime system also depended on one-third precogs to predict the future. The difference from the movie was that all three precogs were gibe; one didnt prevail over the other. T he technology was not as extravagantly tech as the m! ovie. Instead of balls rolling out containing all the visions, just a mere sheet of root came out. distri only ifively precog produced their own vision and it was sent to three diametrical papers. If two visions were similar then it was the majority report and that was rent to determine the crime, but the other vision that was not similar was the minority report that was disregarded. The dependence of the visions still stands as the debatable entity of the whole system. Towards the end of the book, all three precogs produced a minority report. Their visions did not match each other. The last vision produced was considered the intimately accurate and was used by the pre-crime system. This vision showed that the military was perspicacityed(predicate) to destroy the pre-crime system. Comparing this to the movie, the vision in the movie showed that the overlord of the system committed murder himself and used the system to height it up. Anderton used the vision to stop the inj ustice created by his instruct and got release of the pre-crime system. On the other hand, in the book, Anderton commits murder by cleanup spot Landen to keep the pre-crime system existing. The system thusly is still functioning, but it is corrupt. Trust in the system is no longer trustworthy. The pre-crime system prevails by flaws, deceit, and injustice. How accurate and how dependable would the system be?Trust in people is another element. In the movie for example, we can see that Anderton trusted his teach. Every human being have friends and family members whom we rely on. Whenever we beat depress we forever run to in some way for comfort, in our headland thinking that they are soulfulness who we can really trust, its just lifelike. In the movie, Anderton trusted his mentor. His mentor was not just his boss, but to Anderton hes someone whom he can always talk to. He knows everything about Anderton, because Anderton comes to him whenever he has problems. For instance, A ndertons depression over his son or when Anderton fi! x out that he was difference to kill someone, his mentor was the one whom he contacts seeking for helps branch. He did not even question his faith in this soul until the very end when his wife notice him of it, where he finds out that the one who is stooge all the troubles was his mentor, which makes the movie more raise because of the relationship amongst him and his mentor. It causes us to feels a little clemency for Anderton because of the fact that he was betrayed by what we could say, his best friend.

In the book however, Anderton did not have a mentor. His wife seemingly takes on the role of his mentor. D ifferently however, sort of of trusting as he did for his mentor in the movie, Anderton was laughable of his wife early on in the story. He universe opinion that his wife took some part in figure him. It was like the opposite relationship between him and his mentor versus him and his wife. First, he trusted his mentor but he was left with only betrayal at the end. With his wife, however, he was suspicious of her at first but then later finds out that she has been on his side all along. Seemingly, in movies and story the villain is like someone whom the character knows and trusts. Trust in fate, a power conceit to tell all events and impossible to extend a persons destiny, is the most significant fixings in the book and movie. Fate has an overwhelming power over the mind. This thing called fate is able to weartain a person and that person has no ability to sort it. It is a power that settles ahead of time how things happen. Fate is indispensable no subject area what a nyone tries, no matter what anyone does, no matter wh! at anyone believes they have accomplished, they have no control over fate. In the book and movie, fate was taken out of the lifelike cycle of life. People thought they could control ones fate by determining ahead of time their actions. The pre-crime system thought that they could embarrass world destruction by predicting who the murderers were. They never believed nor allowed the natural centre of plectrum to be given. Everybody has a choice that determines his or her fate. Anderson figures this out by the help of Agatha. She tells him that he still has a choice, which completely destroys the whole pre-crime system. He makes his choice not to swarm the poke fun that supposedly killed his son, which gives him another alternative to live. His mentor also had a fate, which he chose. At the end he had a choice to shoot Anderson to prove that the pre-crime system prevails and get declare for it, but he chose his own fate and killed himself. There would be no future if everything could be predicted. The future would seize to exist. The on-key meaning of trust can only be found when individuals willingingly enter a state of mind that will allow trust to mature. Trust cannot be forced, it has to be searched out in the mind of each individual and the path has to be taken by the individual alone. Someone who has been there can help with the dispatch but it is still a journey that must be taken alone. Ones trust in technology, trust in a person, and trust in fate could be the deciding factor of how they chose their life to exist. Works CitedDick, Phillip K. The nonage Report. 1956. The Minority Report. Dir. Steven Spielberg. Perf. Tom Cruise, Colin Farrell, Samantha Morton, Perter Stormare, and sludge Von Sydow. 20th Century Fox, 2002. If you want to get a skilful essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: ! cheap essay